Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
| Mitchell Keith Goodrum |
| D. Jones, Nevada, State of, Warden William Gittere, G. Carpenter, C.O. Esquivel, Drummond, Steve Sisolack and McDaniels |
| 3:2020cv00450 |
| August 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Robert C Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (AB) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Docket Correction to ECF No. 10 Order : Docketing Error noted, entry into wrong case. (no image attached) (DRM) |
Filing 10
DOCKETING ERROR - WRONG CASE - DISREGARD THIS ENTRY : ORDER - Clerk will send Plaintiff the approved IFP application form. (Form and instr attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Payment of $400 filing fee, or fully complete IFP application as specified herein is due by 11/24/2020. Clerk will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/28/2020. (Attachments: # 1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 9/29/2020 to denote docketing error; NEF regenerated (DRM).
|
|
Filing 9
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court strike the "first amended complaint" (ECF No. #7 ) from this docket. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court docket the proposed new complaint and new application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #8 -1) in a new case and send Plaintiff a courtesy copy of those documents with his new case number. (Courtesy copies to be sent electronically to P on 9/24/2020 at ESP upon new case opening, and filing.) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ERROR, re ECF No. #7 Amended Complaint, by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (Attachments: #1 Proposed New Case Complaint) (KR) |
| Filing 7 STRICKEN PURSUANT TO ECF No. #9 ORDER : FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Mitchell Keith Goodrum. Adds and removes parties. (AB) Modified on 9/24/2020 to denote stricken (DRM). |
| Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (Attachments: #1 Copy of ECF No. #4 Order) (AB) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Clerk will send Plaintiff the approved form IFP application and instructions. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Fully complete IFP or $400 filing fee due by 10/5/2020. Clerk of the Court will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER - Fourth Amended General Order 2012-01 re mandatory E-filing for cases by inmates at NNCC, LCC, ESP, and HDSP. (DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE - RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Counsel, #3 Cover Letter) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
