Favor
| Brandon Favor |
| 3:2020cv00469 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Reduce Set Opinion, by Petitioner Brandon Favor. Responses due by 10/1/2020. (DRM) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Exclude Statements by Petitioner Brandon Favor. Responses due by 9/22/2020. (LW) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against has been received and assigned case number 3:20-CV-00469. (AB) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Envelope) (AB) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (LE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Favor | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brandon Favor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
