Summit Resources v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
Summit Resources and Summit Resources, LLC |
State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company |
3:2020cv00497 |
August 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. § 635 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Cooney, Sean) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand re #1 Amended Petition for Removal, filed by State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/6/2020.(Cooney, Sean) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. (Cooney, Sean) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/21/2020. By Deputy Clerk: Peggie Vannozzi. The Court has reviewed to Defendant's response to Order to Show Cause (ECF No. #7 ) and finds that Defendant has satisfied the Order (ECF No. #6 ).(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 8 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. (Cooney, Sean) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to #6 Order to Show Cause, by Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Nevada SOS Business Search for Summit Resources LLC) (Cooney, Sean) |
|
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/2/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 9/17/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Docket Correction to #1 Petition for Removal. QC modified event to Petition for Removal. (no image attached) (LE) |
Filing 1 First AMENDED PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Second Judicial District Court, Case Number CV20-01103, by State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. No changes to parties. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Service) (Cooney, Sean) Modified on 9/1/2020 denote that document is not an amended petition. Glitch with pay.gov and advised counsel to file as amended to avoid being charged twice. (LE). |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.