Protect Our Girls et al v. Cegavske et al
| Protect Our Girls and Melissa Clement |
| Tammi Rae Spero, Aubrey Rowlatt, Kathy Lewis, Linda Rothery, Joseph P. Gloria, Christopher Nepper, Nichole Baldwin, Sandra Merlino, Deanna Spikula, Nikki A. Bryan, Vanessa Stevens, Lacey Donaldson, Lisa Hoehna, Lisa Lloyd, Elko County Clerk Sadie Sullivan, Lacinda Elgan, Kristina Jakeman, Barbara G Cegavske, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte and Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains |
| Nevada Resort Association and BizPAC |
| 3:2020cv00515 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/27/2020. In light of the dismissal of this action (ECF No. #27 ), Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. #23 ) and the motions to intervene (ECF Nos. #8 ), #11 ) are denied as moot.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 27
ORDER granting ECF No. #26 Stipulation of Dismissal; Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/26/2020.; Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
|
| Filing 26 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice re #1 Complaint,,, by Plaintiffs Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls. (OMara, David) |
| Filing 25 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/22/2020. Plaintiffs' ex parte motion for an order shortening time, an expedited briefing schedule, and a hearing date ("Motion") (ECF No. #24 ) essentially seeks emergency relief. But the Motion suffers from several defects. First, it does not comply with LR 7-4. Moreover, Plaintiffs may have created the 'emergency' they now ask the Court to resolve. Plaintiffs filed this case on September 10, and did not seek any emergency relief at that time. (ECF No. #1 .) In addition, Plaintiffs state their initial request to the Secretary was denied back in April, and they include a vague reference to a settlement agreement in their Motion that must have fallen apart, because they have since filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. #23 ), but do not explain when or why that agreement fell apart, or indeed why this case now requires the Court's expedited review considering that Plaintiffs have been aware of the November 18, 2020 deadline they now point to in support of their request for expedited review since they filed this case over a month ago. (ECF No. #24 at 2-3.) For these reasons, the Motion is denied without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a motion that complies with LR 7-4.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
| Filing 24 MOTION to Expedite Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date re #23 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, by Plaintiffs Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (OMara, David) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls. Responses due by 11/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit, #21 Exhibit, #22 Exhibit) (OMara, David) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER granting ECF No. #16 Motion to Extend Time : Rural County Defendants' Answer/response to ECF No. #1 Complaint due by 11/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/16/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 21 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, filed by Deanna Spikula.(Kaplan, Herbert) |
| Filing 20 NON-OPPOSITION to #11 Motion to Intervene, #8 Motion to Intervene, by Defendant Aubrey Rowlatt. (Woodbury, Jason) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, filed by Joseph P. Gloria. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/29/2020.(Miller, Mary-Anne) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to #8 Motion to Intervene, #11 Motion to Intervene by Defendant Deanna Spikula. Replies due by 10/22/2020. (Kaplan, Herbert) |
| Filing 17 NON-OPPOSITION to #11 Motion to Intervene, #8 Motion to Intervene, by Defendants Nichole Baldwin, Nikki A. Bryan, Lacey Donaldson, Lacinda Elgan, Lisa Hoehna, Kristina Jakeman, Kathy Lewis, Lisa Lloyd, Sandra Merlino, Christopher Nepper, Linda Rothery, Tammi Rae Spero, Vanessa Stevens, Sadie Sullivan. (Hardy, Brian) |
| Filing 16 First MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) in Which to File a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's re #1 Complaint,,, by Defendants Nichole Baldwin, Nikki A. Bryan, Lacey Donaldson, Lacinda Elgan, Lisa Hoehna, Kristina Jakeman, Kathy Lewis, Lisa Lloyd, Sandra Merlino, Christopher Nepper, Linda Rothery, Tammi Rae Spero, Vanessa Stevens, Sadie Sullivan. (Hardy, Brian) |
| Filing 15 NON-OPPOSITION to #11 Motion to Intervene, #8 Motion to Intervene, by Defendant Barbara G Cegavske. (Zunino, Gregory) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting ECF No. #13 Motion to Extend Time. Defendant Barbara Cegavske's responsive pleading to ECF No. #1 Complaint is due by November 2, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/14/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
| Filing 13 First MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) in Which to file a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiffs' re #1 Complaint,,, by Defendant Barbara G Cegavske. (Zunino, Gregory) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED the joint motion to approve the consent decree (ECFNo. #10 ) is denied without prejudice, and with leave to file a corrected motion that corrects the deficiencies identified above. FURTHER ORDERED that, should the parties file a corrected joint motion to approve the consent decree, they must file either a joint brief, or separate briefs, addressing therelated questions of whether Plaintiffs have standing to prosecute this case, and whether the Court would have jurisdiction to approve a revised consent decree. FURTHER ORDERED the Court will determine whether additional briefing isnecessary upon review of Plaintiffs' and Defendants' briefing on standing and jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/9/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LE)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Intervene by Defendants Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte. Responses due by 10/22/2020. (Benson, K.) |
| Filing 10 Joint Motion to Approve Consent Decree UNOPPOSED MOTION by Plaintiffs Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (OMara, David) Modified event on 10/8/2020 (LE). |
| Filing 9 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE by Aubrey Rowlatt on 10/6/2020 executed by Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls. (OMara, David) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Intervene by Intervenor Defendants Nevada Resort Association, BizPAC. Responses due by 10/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Virginia Valentine, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Paul Moradkhan, #3 Exhibit Proposed Motion to Dismiss) (Benson, K.) |
| Filing 7 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE by Barbara G Cegavske on 9/22/2020 executed by Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls. (OMara, David) |
| Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE by Nichole Baldwin, Nikki A. Bryan, Lacey Donaldson, Lacinda Elgan, Lisa Hoehna, Kristina Jakeman, Kathy Lewis, Lisa Lloyd, Sandra Merlino, Christopher Nepper, Linda Rothery, Tammi Rae Spero, Vanessa Stevens, Sadie Sullivan on 9/24/2020 executed by Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls. (OMara, David) |
| Filing 5 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE by Deanna Spikula on 9/24/2020 executed by Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls. (OMara, David) |
| Filing 4 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE by Joseph P. Gloria on 9/24/2020 executed by Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls re #1 Complaint,,,. (OMara, David) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONSES ISSUED as to All Defendants re ECF No. #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons, #16 Summons, #17 Summons) (KR) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-6164542) by Melissa Clement, Protect Our Girls. Proof of service due by 12/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons, #16 Summons, #17 Summons, #18 Summons, #19 Summons) (OMara, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
