Goodrum v. Churchill County Detention Center et al
Mitchell Keith Goodrum |
John Scott, Churchill County Detention Center, Bell, Corporal Shawn Summers, Johnson, New River Township and Shawn Summers |
3:2020cv00540 |
September 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 EX PARTE MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (AB) |
Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (AB) |
Filing 3 ORDER - Clerk will send Plaintiff the approved IFP application form. (Form and instructions attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Payment of $400 filing fee, or fully complete IFP application as specified herein is due by 11/24/2020. Clerk will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KR) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE: No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received, by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Counsel) (KR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.