Wright v. Las Vegas Metro Police/CCDC
| Daniel H Wright |
| Las Vegas Metro Police/CCDC, Clark County Detention Center/Electronic Monitoring Program and Clark County Public Defender Office |
| 3:2020cv00558 |
| September 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Daniel H Wright (Added Defendants to docket sheet to match Complaint). (AB) |
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Daniel H Wright. (AB) |
Filing 3
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will SEND to Plaintiff the approved form for filing a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint and instructions for the same. (Mailed 10/20/2020.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff will have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to submit a complaint to this court (11/19/2020). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/20/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, by Plaintiff Daniel H Wright. (No complaint enclosed.) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (LE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
