Randell v. Prengaman et al
Timothy Randell |
Maizie Pusich and Luke Prengaman |
3:2020cv00561 |
September 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER - Clerk will send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate, including the information and instructions for the same (Attached hereto for distribution to Plaintiff by ESP). On or before December 7, 2020, Plaintiff will either pay the full $400 filing fee or file with the Court a completed IFP application, a financial certificate, and a copy of the inmate's prison/jail trust fund account statement for the previous six-month period. If Plaintiff does not timely comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. Clerk will retain the Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (AB) |
Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (AB) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (LE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.