Woods v. United States of America et al
Jacob Alexander Woods |
Dustin Buttler, Justin Cragg, Jacob Kincaid, United States of America, Scott Rasmussen and Megan Rachow |
3:2020cv00569 |
October 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
William G Cobb |
Miranda M Du |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:20-CV-00569-MMD-WGC. (no image attached) (LE) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/2/2020. With good cause appearing, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin recuses herself in this action. IT IS ORDERED that this action is referred to the Clerk for random reassignment of this case for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LE) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (LW) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jacob Alexander Woods. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (LW) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (LE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.