Goodrum v. Charles Woodman Law Firm et al
Plaintiff: Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant: Peter Smith, Charles Woodman Law Firm and Charles Woodman
Case Number: 3:2020cv00573
Filed: October 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Referring Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2020 Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 11/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that Judge Baldwin's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. #4 ) is accepted and adopted in full; Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is granted; Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. #1 -2) is denied as moot; Plaintiff's amended complaint (ECF No. #3 ) is dismissed without prejudice, and without leave to amend; Clerk directed to enter judgment accordingly close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/16/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
October 19, 2020 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) be granted; that the Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #1 -2) be denied as moot; and that the Amended Complaint (ECF No. #3 ) be dismissed without prejudice and without leave to amend. Objections to R&R due by 11/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
October 7, 2020 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Mitchell Keith Goodrum. No changes to parties. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4) (LW)
October 2, 2020 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (AB)
October 2, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (AB) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2020: #2 Ex Parte Motion for Appointment of Counsel) (AB).
October 2, 2020 Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (LE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodrum v. Charles Woodman Law Firm et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Woodman Law Firm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Woodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Represented By: ESP Law Library
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?