Estrada et al v. City of Reno
Gladis Estrada and Angel Estrada |
Reno, City of |
3:2020cv00579 |
October 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Condemnation |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of Reno, re ECF No. #1 Complaint. (KR) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Angel Estrada, Gladis Estrada that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. (Busby, Luke) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-6205109) by Gladis Estrada, Angel Estrada. Proof of service due by 1/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Verification, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Busby, Luke) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (LE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.