Davis v. Gittere et al
| Keonis Lamont Davis |
| William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2020cv00587 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER denying ECF No. #1 IFP Application. Payment of filing fees due by 11/18/2020. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner two copies of this order. (2nd copy attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) It is further ordered that Petitioner make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this order attached to the check paying the filing fee. (Attachments: #1 2nd Copy of Order for Plaintiff)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against William Gittere, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:20-cv-00587. (KR) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Petitioner Keonis Lamont Davis. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) (KR) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/19/2020) (LW). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/19/2020: #2 Motion for Stay and Abeyance) (LW). |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (LE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
