Richards v. Saul
Plaintiff: Christine Ann Richards
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2020cv00598
Filed: October 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (AB)
October 23, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney (Issued, filed, and distributed per ECF No. #3 Order). (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney General, #2 Summons Issued as to United States Attorney) (AB)
October 23, 2020 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by Christine Ann Richards. Proof of service due by 1/21/2021. (Filed per ECF No. #3 Order) (AB)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER - The Plaintiff's Request to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall file the Complaint. Clerk shall issue summons to Andrew Saul, the U.S. Attorney General, and the United States Attorney. Clerk shall deliver the summons and sufficient copies of the Complaint to the USM for service (Electronic distribution to USM on 10/23/2020). Clerk shall send Plaintiff sufficient copies of service of process forms (USM-285) for each Defendant (Attached hereto for electronic distribution to Plaintiff's counsel). Plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days in which to return the USM-285 forms to the USM at 400 South Virginia Street, 2nd Floor, Reno NV 89501. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 USM-285 Form, #2 USM-285 Form, #3 USM-285 Form)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
October 23, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Christine Ann Richards. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kalagian, Marc)
October 23, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christine Ann Richards. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Kalagian, Marc) Modified on 10/26/2020 (AB).
October 23, 2020 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richards v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Ann Richards
Represented By: Marc V Kalagian
Represented By: Leonard Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?