Whitfield v. Nevada State Personnel et al
| Michael Whitfield |
| Nevada Department of Correction, Nevada Department of Administration, Nevada State Personnel, James Dzurenda and Lorna Ward |
| 3:2020cv00643 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 OBJECTION to ECF No. #3 Report and Recommendation, by Plaintiff Michael Whitfield. Response to Objections to R&R due by 12/16/2020. (DRM) |
Filing 3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the District Judge enter an order dismissing the 3:20-cv-00643 action as duplicative of the 3:20-cv-00637 action. Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 11/18/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE - No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. Receipt of Initiating Documents on behalf of Plaintiff : (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Certificate of Interested Parties, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Cover Letter) (DRM) Modified on 11/16/2020 for spelling (DRM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
