Conlin et al v City of Reno
Timothy Conlin and Shelly Conlin |
Reno, City of |
3:2021cv00012 |
January 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
William G Cobb |
Miranda M Du |
Larry R Hicks |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/25/2021. By Deputy Clerk: Peggie Vannozzi. Per the Court's order in In re 2017 Lemmon Valley Flood (Case No. 3:21-cv-00093-MMD-WGC, ECF No. 1), this case has been consolidated with the related cases for the purposes of pretrial motions and dispositive motions that share common legal and factual bases. In accordance with the Court's order, the pending motion to dismiss in this case (ECF No. #11 ) is denied as moot. Defendant is ordered to refile its motion in In re 2017 Lemmon Valley Flood (Case No. 3:21-cv-00093-MMD-CLB) in accordance with the Court's scheduling order. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 16 ORDER to Consolidate Cases. It is ORDERED that 3:21-CV-12 is consolidated under 3:21-CV-93-MMD-CLB. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 2/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/10/2021. Good cause appearing, Plaintiff's motion to extend time (ECF No. #14 ) to file a response to Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. #11 ) is granted. Responses due by 2/24/2021.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #11 Motion to Dismiss, by Plaintiffs Shelly Conlin, Timothy Conlin. (Doyle, Roger) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Chandeni K Sendall on behalf of Defendant Reno, City of. (Sendall, Chandeni) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jonathan David Shipman on behalf of Defendant Reno, City of. (Shipman, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, by Defendant Reno, City of. Responses due by 2/15/2021. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 3/18/2021. (McKean, William) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/28/2021. In light of the Court's order (ECF No. 9 ), Plaintiff's motion to consolidate cases (ECF No. #8 ) is denied as moot. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 9 ORDER. The Court finds that this case is related to Case No. 3:20-cv-00579-MMD-CLB, which is the first filed case, currently referred to United States Magistrate Judge Carla L. Baldwin. The Court finds that reassignment of this case to Judge Baldwin from United States Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb will promote judicial efficiency. Accordingly, it is ordered that the Clerks Office reassigned this case to Judge Baldwin. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:21-cv-12-MMD-CLB. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Plaintiffs Shelly Conlin, Timothy Conlin. Responses due by 2/4/2021. (Doyle, Roger) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Timothy Conlin, Shelly Conlin re #1 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued. Reno, City of served on 1/13/2021. (Doyle, Roger) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:21-cv-00012-MMD-WGC. (no image attached) (WJ) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/11/2021. By Judicial Assistant: Elaine Muhlebach. With good cause appearing, the Honorable Judge Larry R. Hicks recuses himself in this action. IT IS ORDERED that this action is referred to the Clerk for random reassignment of this case for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EM) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of Reno, re ECF No. #1 Complaint. (KR) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Shelly Conlin, Timothy Conlin. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Doyle, Roger) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Reno (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6321781) by Timothy Conlin, Shelly Conlin. Proof of service due by 4/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Doyle, Roger) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.