Iden v. Carpenter et al
| Richard Iden |
| Carpenter, Nurse Name on Exhibits 1-3, Nurse Signature on Exhibit 5, Nurse Signature on Exhibit 4 and Michael Minev |
| 3:2021cv00027 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - Within 14 days of the date of this Order (3/12/2021), the Attorney General's Office shall advise the court whether it will enter a limited notice of appearance on behalf of Defendants, and if so, also within 14 days of the date of this Order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a response to Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. #6 ). The Clerk of the Court shall electronically serve a copy of this Order, a copy of Plaintiff's FAC (ECF No. #5 ), as well as a copy of Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. #6 ) on the Nevada Attorney General's Office by adding the Nevada Attorney General's Office to the docket sheet. (E-service to AG on 3/1/2021; ECF Nos. #5 , #6 via NEF regeneration.) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 2/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing 7
SCREENING ORDER - Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. #5 ) is the operative complaint in this action. Plaintiff's first application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is denied as moot, and Plaintiff's second application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #4 ) is the operative application in this action. A decision on Plaintiff's operative application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #4 ) is deferred. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs may proceed against Carpenter and Minev. This action is stayed for 90 days (5/27/2021) to allow the parties an opportunity to settle. On or before 90 days from the date this order is entered, AG must file the 90-day stay report form. If the case does not settle, Plaintiff will be required to pay the full $350.00 filing fee. Any "Motion to Exclude Case from Mediation" is due on or before 21 days from the date of this order. Clerk will electronically serve a copy of this order and Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. #5 ) on AG (electronic service on 2/26/2021). AG must advise the Court within 21 days of the date of the entry of this order whether it will enter a limited notice of appearance on behalf of Defendants for the purpose of settlement. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Richard Iden. Responses due by 3/5/2021. (AB) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Plaintiff Richard Iden. Adds new party. (KR) |
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Richard Iden. (KR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Additional Evidence, by Plaintiff Richard Iden. (KR) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Richard Iden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint) (KR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
