Bohannan v. Gittere et al
| Timothy J. Bohannan |
| William Gittere, Nevada Department of Corrections, David Drummond, Kerri Sprouse, D. Jones, Bobby Parker, Tasheena Sandoval, L. Drew, David Gudoy, Carpenter, Hernandez, Harold Wickham and Roman |
| 3:2021cv00059 |
| January 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy J. Bohannan. (AB) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's ECF No. #1 IFP application; directing Clerk to send Plaintiff IFP form and instructions (attached hereto for transmittal to P); giving Plaintiff to March 29, 2021 to either file fully complete IFP application or pay full filing fee of $402; directing Clerk to retain ECF No. #1 -1 Complaint but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 1/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form and Instructions) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Timothy J. Bohannan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint) (KR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
