In re Britt
Plaintiff: Juacell D Britt and Jaucell Duvon Britt
Case Number: 3:2021cv00139
Filed: March 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Referring Judge: William G Cobb
2 Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed by Jaucell Britt. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Copies of ECF Nos. 6, 7, 3, and judge assignment) (DRM)
April 8, 2021 Filing 7 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant (completed per ECF No. #6 Order). (AB)
April 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - The blank application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is denied without prejudice. Clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy of the instructions and application to proceed IFP for a non-prisoner, the 1983 Civil Rights Complaint form, and non-inmate advisory letter (mailed to Plaintiff on 4/8/2021). Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order to either file his completed IFP application or pay the full $402 filing fee, and to file a completed civil rights complaint on the form the Clerk sends. If Plaintiff fails to timely file a completed IFP application or pay the filing fee and file a completed civil rights complaint, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
April 1, 2021 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb for all further proceedings within his jurisdiction. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:21-cv-00139-MMD-WGC. (no image attached) (LE)
April 1, 2021 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 4/1/2021. By Deputy Clerk: L. Ettinger. With good cause appearing, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin recuses herself in this action. IT IS ORDERED that this action is referred to the Clerk for random reassignment of this case for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LE)
March 29, 2021 Filing 3 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (SC)
March 29, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Manual Filing by Plaintiff Juacell D Britt. Object: 1 CD. Description: Plaintiff's Renown Health Records (password encrypted). manually filed with the Clerk's Office. (SC)
March 29, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Juacell D Britt. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit to Complaint, #3 Notice). (SC)
March 29, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re Britt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juacell D Britt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaucell Duvon Britt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?