Kerr et al v. Aldridge/Pite LLP et al
Terry Kerr and Dennis Kerr |
New Rez c/o PHH Mortgage Services, Kathryn Moorer and Aldridge/Pite LLP |
3:2021cv00147 |
March 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment, by Plaintiffs Terry Kerr, Dennis Kerr. Responses due by 6/16/2021. (DRM) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Terry Kerr and Dennis Kerr re ECF No. #2 -1 Summons Issued. Aldridge/Pite LLP served on 4/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (SC) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/6/2021, regarding the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to ECF No. #6 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Kathryn Moorer, New Rez c/o PHH Mortgage Services that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Ocwen Financial Corporation, Corporate Parent New Residential Investment Corp. for New Rez c/o PHH Mortgage Services added. (Allison, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 REQUEST for Judicial Notice re #6 Motion to Dismiss, by Defendants Kathryn Moorer, New Rez c/o PHH Mortgage Services. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Deed of Trust, #2 Exhibit 2- Kerr 2011 Idaho Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3- Order Following Removal of Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4- Appeal Memorandum of Decision, #5 Exhibit 5- Kerr 2018 Idaho Complaint, #6 Exhibit 6- District Court Memorandum of Decision, #7 Exhibit 7- 4- Appeal Memorandum of Decision for Second Action, #8 Exhibit 8- Trial Period Modification Plan, #9 Exhibit 9- Permanent Modification Agreement, #10 Exhibit 10- Kerr 2020 Idaho Complaint, #11 Exhibit 11- District Court Memorandum of Decision on Third Action, #12 Exhibit 12- List of Recorded Instruments) (Allison, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Defendants Kathryn Moorer, New Rez c/o PHH Mortgage Services. Responses due by 5/19/2021. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 6/19/2021. (Allison, Jeffrey) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Unissued Summons as to Kathryn Moorer, by Plaintiff Dennis Kerr. (SC) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 3 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (SC) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to all defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Aldridge Pite LLP, #2 Summons Issued as to New Rez c/o PHH Mortgage Services) (SC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants (Filing fee $402; Receipt No. NVRNO5200) by Terry Kerr and Dennis Kerr. Proof of service due by 6/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (SC) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.