Whiteley v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Tanicia Danielle Whiteley
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security and ORC, USAG, USAO
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2021cv00191
Filed: April 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Christopher James Bella on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Bella, Christopher)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tanicia Danielle Whiteley re #1 Complaint,,. ORC, USAG, USAO served on 6/7/2021. (Taylor, Hal)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONSES ISSUED re ECF No. #1 Complaint - Summons Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney's Office) (KR)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (AF)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Tanicia Danielle Whiteley. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6461837) by Tanicia Danielle Whiteley. Proof of service due by 7/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, #3 Summons OGC, #4 Summons USAG, #5 Summons USAO) (Taylor, Hal) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified on 4/28/2021 (AF).
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whiteley v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanicia Danielle Whiteley
Represented By: Hal Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Represented By: Christopher James Bella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ORC, USAG, USAO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?