Gregg v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Trudy Ann Gregg
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2021cv00201
Filed: April 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner Of Social Security, U.S. Attorney General. and U.S. Attorney. (Attachments: #1 U.S. Attorney General, #2 U.S. Attorney) (DRM)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT by Trudy Ann Gregg. Proof of service due by 7/29/2021. (Filed, and service, pursuant to ECF No. #4 Order.)(DRM)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - Plaintiff's ECF No. #1 IFP application is GRANTED. Clerk shall issue summons to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney General, and U.S. Attorney as specified herein. Clerk shall file the complaint. Clerk shall deliver the summons and sufficient copies of the complaint to the USM for service. (Summons and complaint emailed to USM on 4/30/2021 Clerk shall send plaintiff sufficient copies of service of process forms (USM-285) for each defendant. (Three (3) USM-285's attached hereto for P's counsel of record.) Plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days in which to return the required forms USM-285 to the U.S. Marshal at 400 S. Virginia Street, 2nd Floor, Reno, Nevada 89501. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 4/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 USM-285 Copy 1, #2 USM-285 Copy 2, #3 USM-285 Copy 3)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (AF)
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Trudy Ann Gregg. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal)
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Trudy Ann Gregg. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. A to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, #4 Summons OGC, #5 Summons USAG, #6 Summons USAO) (Taylor, Hal) Modified on 4/30/2021 (AF).
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gregg v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trudy Ann Gregg
Represented By: Hal Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?