Juarez v. Allied Universal et al
Plaintiff: Victor Camargo Juarez
Defendant: Allied Universal Security Services and Allied Universal
Case Number: 3:2021cv00221
Filed: May 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Referring Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2021 Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that this action be DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to comply with LR IA 3-1. Objections to R&R due by 7/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 6/28/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)
June 25, 2021 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/25/2021, regarding the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to ECF No. #10 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
June 24, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss #4 Complaint by Defendants Allied Universal, Allied Universal Security Services. Responses due by 7/8/2021. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 8/8/2021. (Cecil, Matthew) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
June 4, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS/USM-285 Returned Executed on 6/2/2021 as to Debra Vandusen for Allied Universal re ECF No. #5 Summons Issued. (SC)
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - Pursuant to Local Rule IA 3-1, Plaintiff must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff shall have until June 24, 2021 to file a notice of change of address or this court will recommend that this action be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 5/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
May 26, 2021 Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re ECF No. #2 Advisory Letter, addressed to Victor Camargo Juarez. (KR)
May 21, 2021 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Assign Judges in Civil Case addressed to Victor Camargo Juarez. (AB)
May 21, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Allied Universal (filed and distributed per ECF No. #3 Screening Order). (AB)
May 21, 2021 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Allied Universal by Victor Camargo Juarez. Proof of service due by 8/19/2021. (Filed and distributed per ECF No. #3 Screening Order). (AB)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SCREENING ORDER - Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is granted. Clerk shall file the Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). The failure to accommodate ADA claim shall proceed against Defendant Allied Universal. Clerk shall ISSUE summons for the above-named Defendant (ECF No. #1 -2) and deliver same to the U.S. Marshal with sufficient copies of the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) and this screening order for service on the Defendant. The Clerk shall SEND to Plaintiff one USM-285 form (mailed to Plaintiff on 5/21/2021). Plaintiff shall have until June 10, 2021, to complete the USM-285 service form and return it to the U.S. Marshal, 400 South Virginia Street, 2nd Floor, Reno, Nevada 89501. If Plaintiff fails to follow this order, the above-named Defendant will be dismissed for failure to complete service of process pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendant every pleading submitted for consideration by the court, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 5/21/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
May 12, 2021 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (SC)
May 12, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Victor Camargo Juarez. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons as to Allied Universal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (SC)
May 12, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb for ENE. (WJ)
May 12, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juarez v. Allied Universal et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victor Camargo Juarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allied Universal Security Services
Represented By: Matthew T. Cecil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allied Universal
Represented By: Matthew T. Cecil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?