Hall v. MR Singh Transport, Inc. et al
| Robert Hall |
| Gagan Chawla and MR Singh Transport, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00234 |
| May 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Howard D McKibben |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Hall re #2 Summons Issued. Gagan Chawla served on 6/5/2021. (Throop, Julie) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Robert Hall. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Throop, Julie) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MR Singh Transport, Inc., and, Gagan Chawla. (Attachments: #1 as to Gagan Chawla) (DRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gagan Chawla, MR Singh Transport, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6495815) by Robert Hall. Proof of service due by 8/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons MR Singh Transport, Inc., #3 Summons Gagan Chawla) (Throop, Julie) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Howard D. McKibben and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
