Lujan v. Smith
| Michael V. Lujan |
| Elaine Smith and Blackstone Career Institute |
| 3:2021cv00286 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable 'Tx SDCC' re NEF ECF No. #2 Order, electronically sent to Michael V. Lujan at NNCC. (DRM) |
Filing 2
ORDER - The Clerk shall SEND Plaintiff a copy of the instructions and application to proceed IFP for an inmate.(Attached hereto for distribution to P via NNCC law library.) Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Order (9/10/2021) to either file his completed IFP application or pay the full $402 filing fee. The court will construe ECF No. #1 as his complaint. If Plaintiff fails to timely file a completed IFP application and financial certificate or pay the filing fee, this action will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Lujan. (SMR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
