Raya Sandoval et al v. Robinson et al
| Daniel Raya Sandoval and Susan Joan Niemann |
| Terri A Robinson, Loren K Miller, Debra A Rogers, Ur M Jaddou, USCIS, Alejandro N Mayorkas, U.S. Dep't of Homeland Security, Conn Schrader, Director National Visa Center, Antony J Blinken and U.S. Dep't of State |
| 3:2021cv00349 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Robert C Jones |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONSES ISSUED re ECF No. #1 Complaint, ECF No. #5 Errata - Summons Ur M. Jaddou. (Attachments: #1 Summons Antony J. Blinken) (KR) |
| Filing 5 ERRATA to #1 Complaint,,,,, by Plaintiffs Susan Joan Niemann, Daniel Raya Sandoval. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons - Jaddou rev., #2 Summons Summons - Blinken rev.) (Edgerton, Kyle) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alejandro N Mayorkas, Loren K Miller, National Visa Center, Terri A Robinson, Debra A Rogers, Conn Schrader, U.S. Dep't of Homeland Security, U.S. Dep't of State, USCIS re ECF No. #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Loren K Miller, #2 Summons Issued as to Terri A Robinson (2), #3 Summons Issued as to Debra A Rogers, #4 Summons Issued as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, #5 Summons Issued as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (2), #6 Summons Issued as to Alejandro N Mayorkas, #7 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security, #8 Summons Issued as to Conn Schrader, #9 Summons Issued as to National Visa Center, #10 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of State) (SC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: Attorney Action Required to #1 Complaint, #2 Certificate of Interested Parties. Attorney Kyle Erik Edgerton advised to review and comply with LR IA 10-2 on all future filings with the Court. Documents #1 and #2 do not need to be modified. (no image attached) (WJ) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Susan Joan Niemann, Daniel Raya Sandoval. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Edgerton, Kyle) |
| Filing 1 First COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6590150) by Susan Joan Niemann, Daniel Raya Sandoval. Proof of service due by 11/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons - Robinson, #3 Summons Summons - Miller, #4 Summons Summons - Rogers, #5 Summons Summons - Jaddou, #6 Summons Summons - USCIS, #7 Summons Summons - Mayorkas, #8 Summons Summons - USDHS, #9 Summons Summons - Schrader, #10 Summons Summons - NVC, #11 Summons Summons - Blinken, #12 Summons Summons - USDOS, #13 Exhibit Exhibit A, #14 Exhibit Exhibit B, #15 Exhibit Exhibit C, #16 Exhibit Exhibit D, #17 Exhibit Exhibit E, #18 Exhibit Exhibit F, #19 Exhibit Exhibit G, #20 Exhibit Exhibit H, #21 Exhibit Exhibit I, #22 Exhibit Exhibit J, #23 Exhibit Exhibit K, #24 Exhibit Exhibit L, #25 Exhibit Exhibit M, #26 Exhibit Exhibit N, #27 Exhibit Exhibit O, #28 Exhibit Exhibit P) (Edgerton, Kyle) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
