Cota v. Gittere et al
| Michael Cota |
| William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2021cv00399 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Change of Deputy Attorney General on behalf of Respondents William Gittere, Nevada Attorney General. Deputy Attorney General Chris William Davis terminated. (Perlick, Jessica) |
| Filing 17 EX PARTE MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Michael Cota. (SC) |
Filing 16
ORDER re LR IA 7-2. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/22/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)
|
| Filing 15 USCA ORDER, Ninth Circuit, as to ECF No. #9 Notice. ("[T]his court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to a state court."). Accordingly, the petition is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. USCA Case Number 21-71278. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR) |
|
Filing 14
ORDERED that Petitioner's Request for Clarification (ECF No. #13 ) is granted. The requested clarification is provided herein. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/13/2021.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION Requesting Clarification re ECF No. #12 Notice of Change of Deputy Attorney General by Petitioner Michael Cota. Responses due by 10/19/2021. (SC) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Deputy Attorney General on behalf of Respondents William Gittere, Nevada Attorney General. Deputy Attorney General Aaron D. Ford-AG terminated. (Davis, Chris) |
| Filing 11 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Michael Cota. (Filed pursuant to ECF No. #10 Order; E-service to AG 9/22/2021.) (DRM) Modified on 9/22/2021 to correct file date (DRM). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER - P's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. #8 ) is granted. P is granted IFP status and will not be required to pay the filing fee for this action. Clerk is directed to separately file Cota's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. #1 -1). The Clerk of Court is directed to add AG as counsel for Respondents and to provide Respondents an electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notice of Electronic Filing to the AG only. (NEFs # #1 - #9 regenerated to AG only on 9/22/2021.) Respondents will have 30 days from the date of this order to appear in this action (10/21/2021). Respondents will have 90 days from the date of this order (12/20/2021) to answer/respond to the habeas petition. (See pdf order for additional subsequent deadlines.) Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/21/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 9/22/2021 to add hyperlink to NEFs # 1-9 (DRM).
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re ECF No. #6 Order on Motion/Application to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Petitioner Michael Cota. Responses due by 10/4/2021. (SC) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE from USCA Clerk to Petitioner/Counsel : Petition for writ of mandamus received and assigned case number 21-71278. IFP or docket fee due. (DRM) |
| Filing 7 MOTION Request for Clarification/Notice of Compliance, by Petitioner Michael Cota. (Filed, and motion for reconsideration within the request is denied, pursuant to ECF No. #6 Order.) (DRM) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - Petitioner Michael Cota's second application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #5 ) is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to separately file Cota's "Request for Clarification/ Notice of Compliance" (ECF No. #5 -2). The motion for reconsideration within the Request for Clarification/Notice of Compliance (ECF No. #5 -2) is denied. Cota will have 45 days from the date of this order (10/29/2021) to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/14/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Michael Cota. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Request for Clarification) (SMR) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Petitioner Michael Cota's "Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody" (ECF No. #3 ) is denied. Cota's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is denied, without prejudice. Cota will have 45 days from the date of this Order to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a fully completed IFP application, including the required financial certificate. The Clerk of Court is directed to send to Cota, along with a copy of this order, two IFP applications (attached hereto for distribution to Plaintiff by ESP). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Form and Instructions (1 of 2), #2 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Form and Instructions (2 of 2))(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by Petitioner Michael Cota. Responses due by 9/17/2021. (SC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Gittere, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:21-cv-00399. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Michael Cota. (Attachments: #1 Petition for WHC) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
