Shamblin et al v. Mid-Century Insurance Company
Ruby Shamblin and Sabrina Yeager |
Mid-Century Insurance Company |
3:2021cv00402 |
September 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting ECF No. #9 Stipulation to Remand. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION to Remand by Defendant Mid-Century Insurance Company. (Feldman, David) |
Filing 8 ORDER TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT - The parties shall meet and confer on items required to be included in the Joint Case Management Report. After the meet and confer, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Report by no later than October 18, 2021. The Case Management Report shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages and shall not include any attached exhibits. Should counsel or a party fail to comply with the directions as set forth in this order, an ex parte hearing may be held and contempt sanctions, including monetary sanctions, dismissal, default, or other appropriate judgment, may be imposed and/or ordered. See PDF image for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/9/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC) |
Filing 7 CIVIL STANDING ORDER of Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/7/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 9/22/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Sabrina Yeager. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Bradshaw, Denise) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
Filing 3 ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by Mid-Century Insurance Company. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 10/18/2021.(Feldman, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Mid-Century Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Feldman, David) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from 4th Judicial District Elko County, NV, Case Number DC-CV-21-87, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6620774) by Mid-Century Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3) (Feldman, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.