Ahl v. Ponderosa Hotel, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Latisha Ahl
Defendant: Ponderosa Hotel, Inc. and Calvin Chittum
Case Number: 3:2022cv00002
Filed: January 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: William G Cobb
Referring Judge: Craig S Denney
2 Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2022 Filing 7 CIVIL STANDING ORDER of Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
January 25, 2022 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE due to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb's retirement, this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:22-cv-00002-MMD-CSD. (no image attached) (LG)
January 19, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latisha Ahl re #1 Complaint, #4 Summons Issued. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF SERVICE - PONDEROSA) (Mausert, Mark)
January 5, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Calvin Chittum and Ponderosa Hotel, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Calvin Chittum) (HKL)
January 4, 2022 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
January 4, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Latisha Ahl. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Mausert, Mark)
January 4, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6749598) by Latisha Ahl. Proof of service due by 4/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (Mausert, Mark) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
January 4, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin for ENE. (WJ)
January 4, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ahl v. Ponderosa Hotel, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latisha Ahl
Represented By: Sean McDowell
Represented By: Mark L. Mausert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ponderosa Hotel, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Calvin Chittum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?