Moraga v. Russell et al
Roy Daniels Moraga |
Perry Russell and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2022cv00013 |
January 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Craig S Denney |
Robert C Jones |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re ECF Nos. #4 Order, #6 Judgment, by Petitioner Roy Daniels Moraga. Responses due by 3/21/2022. (DRM) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT re: ECF No. #4 Order. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 3/2/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) |
Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Roy Daniels Moraga. (Filed and dismissed pursuant to ECF No. #4 .) (HKL) |
|
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE due to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb's retirement, this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:22-cv-00013-RCJ-CSD. (no image attached) (LG) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (Recall). (WJ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Russell, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:22-cv-00013. (DRM) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Roy Daniels Moraga. (Attachments: #1 Petition for WHC 2254) (DRM) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/10/2022) (DRM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.