Burns v. Warden Russell et al
Petitioner: David Burns
Respondent: Warden Russell and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2022cv00021
Filed: January 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Referring Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Reconsider Case re ECF No. #4 Order Dismissing Case, by Petitioner David Burns. Responses due by 3/8/2022. (DRM)
February 14, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Reopen Case by Petitioner David Burns, due to filing fee paid, copy of receipt attached. Responses due by 2/28/2022. (DRM)
February 9, 2022 Filing 5 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 2/9/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - Clerk of Court send Petitioner a blank form for an IFP application for incarcerated litigants with instructions and a blank habeas corpus petition form under 28 U.S.C. 2254 with instructions. (Forms attached hereto for distribution to P via NNCC law library.) Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. #3 ) is denied. This action is dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner's commencement of a new action in which he must either pay the filing fee in full or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a signed financial certificate and a statement of his inmate account. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this action. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions, #2 2254 form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
January 13, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, by Petitioner David Burns. (SMR)
January 13, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against David Burns, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:22-cv-00021. (SMR)
January 13, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 NOT PAID) by David Burns. (Attachments: #1 Vol II, #2 Vol III) (SMR)
January 13, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burns v. Warden Russell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Burns
Represented By: Northern Nevada Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?