Cota v. NDOC Accounting Manager
Michael Cota |
NDOC Accounting Manager |
3:2022cv00038 |
January 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 COMPLAINT by Michael Cota. (Filed and dismissed with leave to amend pursuant to ECF No. #6 Order.) (DRM) |
Filing 6 SCREENING ORDER - A decision on the IFP application (ECF No. #5 ) is deferred. Cota's Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. Defendant the NDOC Accounting Manager is dismissed without prejudice from the Complaint. Any "First Amended" complaint by April 22, 2022. Clerk is directed to file Cota's Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) and send Cota the approved form for filing a 1983 complaint, instructions, and a copy of his Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). (Form, inst, copy of complaint attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 1983 form and instructions, #2 Copy of Complaint for Plaintiff)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Cota. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (HKL) |
Filing 4 ORDER- Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #3 ) is denied without prejudice to file a new fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with all three documents. Clerk will send Plaintiff the approved form IFP application and instructions (Attached for distribution by ESP). Payment of filing fees or completed documents due on or before March 29, 2022. Clerk of the Court will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 1/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application and Instructions) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) |
Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Cota. (HKL) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HKL) |
Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (HKL) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/26/2022) (HKL). (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/27/2022) (HKL). Modified on 1/27/2022 to delete "attachment 2" and combine to attachment 1 as originally submitted (HKL). |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cota v. NDOC Accounting Manager | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Cota | |
Represented By: | ESP Law Library |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: NDOC Accounting Manager | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.