Earley v. Officer Martinez et al
| Marc Anthony Earley |
| Officer Martinez and Acting Warden |
| 3:2022cv00040 |
| January 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Marc Anthony Earley. (HKL) |
Filing 3
ORDERED that ECF No. #1 IFP application is denied without prejudice to file a new fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with all three documents specified herein. Clerk shall send P approved IFP form and instructions. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) $402 filing fee or fully complete IFP application due by 3/28/2022. Clerk will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 1/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (SMR) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Marc Anthony Earley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint) (SMR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
