Longstreet v. Wells et al
Anthony O. Longstreet, SR |
David P Wells, Hayden Solis, P Salinas, P Aguilar and Detective Knickerbocker |
3:2022cv00065 |
February 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, by Plaintiff Anthony O. Longstreet, SR. (Attachments: #1 Proposed FAC) (DRM) |
Filing 3 OBJECTION to ECF No. #2 Report and Recommendation by Plaintiff Anthony O. Longstreet, SR. Response to Objections to R&R due by 2/28/2022. (HKL) |
Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - that Longstreet's application to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. #1 ), be GRANTED; that the Clerk FILE the complaint, (ECF No. #1 -1); and, that Longstreet's complaint, (ECF No. #1 -1), be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Objections to R&R due by 2/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 2/11/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony O. Longstreet, SR. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (HKL) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.