Martin v. Ruebart et al
| Weslie Martin |
| William Ruebart and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2022cv00101 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Larry R Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 5.00, receipt number NVLAS080413. (HKL) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Screening deferred. The Clerk is instructed to send Petitioner a blank form IFP application for incarcerated litigants along with two copies of this order. (2 copies this Order, and IFP application attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) IFP application or $5.00 filing fee due within 45 days of date of this Order (5/9/2022). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 2nd Copy of Order for Petitioner, #2 IFP form and instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Ruebart, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:22-cv-00101. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for WHC, #2 Cover Letter) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
