Rogers v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al
Plaintiff: Bonnie Rogers
Defendant: Harry Rogers and Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois
Case Number: 3:2022cv00107
Filed: February 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Craig S Denney
Referring Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting ECF No. #12 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/19/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
May 19, 2022 Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss with Prejudice by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois. (Todd, Dylan)
April 6, 2022 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/6/2022. By Deputy Clerk: Peggie Vannozzi. The Court has reviewed the status report and notice of settlement (ECF No. #10 .) All deadlines are suspended. The parties are directed to file settlement documents or a joint status report by 6/6/2022. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
April 6, 2022 Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT and Notice of Settlement by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois. (Todd, Dylan)
March 29, 2022 Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Todd, Dylan)
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint. Answer due April 15, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 3/15/2022.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
March 15, 2022 Filing 7 Joint STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) Extension of Time for Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois to Answer Complaint re #1 Petition for Removal,, by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois. (Todd, Dylan)
March 15, 2022 Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois. (Todd, Dylan)
February 28, 2022 Filing 5 CIVIL STANDING ORDER of U.S. Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
February 28, 2022 Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
February 28, 2022 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/28/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 3/15/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 3/30/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
February 28, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ)
February 25, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Safeco Insurance Company Of America, Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Insurance Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Safeco Corporation, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation for Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois added. (Todd, Dylan)
February 25, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Second Judicial District - Washoe County, Case Number CV22-00038, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6810815) by Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dylan Todd, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Todd, Dylan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bonnie Rogers
Represented By: Joseph S Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harry Rogers
Represented By: Joseph S Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois
Represented By: Amy M. Samberg
Represented By: Dylan P Todd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?