Kea v. Division of Parole and Probation et al
Kupaa Kea |
Division of Parole and Probation, Heather Digesti, C. Congdon and Chief of Parole and Probation |
3:2022cv00115 |
March 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Craig S Denney |
Miranda M Du |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kupaa Kea. (HKL) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Kupaa Kea. Old address NNCC. New address 807 Tradewinds Court Sun Valley, NV 89433. (HKL) |
Filing 4 PLEASE DISREGARD. ENTERED INTO THE WRONG CASE Mail (e-filing) Returned as Undeliverable ("Ballard, Daniel discharged 2/25/2022") re ECF No. #3 Mail Returned addressed to Kupaa Kea. (HKL) Modified on 3/3/2022 to denote docketing error (HKL). |
Filing 3 Mail (e-filing) Returned as Undeliverable ("Paroled") re ECF No. #2 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed to Kupaa Kea. (HKL) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kupaa Kea. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel) (HKL) |
Filing 1 Mail Returned as Undeliverable 'Paroled' electronically sent to to Kupaa Kea at NNCC, re Notice of judge assignment. (DRM) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.