Sanchez v. Saucedo et al
| Jasmine Paul Sanchez |
| R. Saucedo and William Reubart |
| 3:2022cv00141 |
| March 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Anne R Traum |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE that in order to create a caseload for U.S. District Judge Anne R. Traum, this case is reassigned to Judge Anne R. Traum for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:22-cv-00141-ART-CLB. (no image attached) (CJD) |
| Filing 4 Mail (e-filing) REFUSED ("refused to uncover his window to receive delivery from U.S.D.C") re Assign Judges in Civil Case, ECF No. #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. #2 Advisory Letter Pro Se non-habeas, and ECF No. #3 Clerk's Notice addressed to Jasmine Sanchez. (HKL) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE. Electronic filing of prisoner filings at Ely State Prison is now mandatory under General Order 2012-01. (DRM) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jasmine Paul Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
