Montz et al v. Nevada Business Corporations, Inc. et al
| Richard Montz and Laverna Montz |
| Nevada Business Corporations, Inc., Proback Systems, Inc., Wayne Wakefield and Aristocrat Ventures |
| 3:2022cv00145 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Notes: Transfer to the Eastern District of California completed: case no. 2:22-cv-00814 assigned. (CJD) |
Filing 21
ORDER granting ECF No. #20 Stipulation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404, for the convenience of the parties, and in the interests of justice, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States DistrictCourt for the Eastern District of California. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/13/2022.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJD)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION to Change Venue re #12 Motion to Remand to State Court by Plaintiffs Laverna Montz, Richard Montz. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Phan, Andrew) |
| Civil Case Terminated and electronically transferred to the Eastern District of California. (CJD) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to #17 Motion to Strike by Defendants Aristocrat Ventures, Nevada Business Corporations, Inc., Proback Systems, Inc., Wayne Wakefield. Replies due by 5/13/2022. (Booth, Damon) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to #12 Motion to Remand to State Court by Defendants Aristocrat Ventures, Nevada Business Corporations, Inc., Proback Systems, Inc., Wayne Wakefield. Replies due by 5/13/2022. (Booth, Damon) |
| Filing 17 Amended MOTION to Strike by Plaintiffs Laverna Montz, Richard Montz. Responses due by 5/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Phan, Andrew) |
| Filing 16 Withdrawal of Motion NOTICE Of Withdrawal of Motion by Laverna Montz, Richard Montz re #13 Motion to Strike. (Phan, Andrew) QC Modified event on 4/26/2022 (LE). |
| Filing 15 STATUS REPORT by Plaintiffs Laverna Montz, Richard Montz. (Phan, Andrew) |
| Filing 14 STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE MARCH 25, 2022 MINUTES OF THE COURT by Defendants Aristocrat Ventures, Nevada Business Corporations, Inc., Proback Systems, Inc., Wayne Wakefield. (Booth, Damon) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Strike #5 Answer to Complaint, by Plaintiffs Laverna Montz, Richard Montz. Responses due by 5/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Phan, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiffs Laverna Montz, Richard Montz. Responses due by 5/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Phan, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (WJ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT - After the meet and confer, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Report by no later than May 14, 2022 as detailed herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 4/12/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
| Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER of Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for #4 Minute Order Removal Case, by Defendants Aristocrat Ventures, Nevada Business Corporations, Inc., Proback Systems, Inc., Wayne Wakefield. (Booth, Damon) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Aristocrat Ventures, Nevada Business Corporations, Inc., Proback Systems, Inc., Wayne Wakefield. (Booth, Damon) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Aristocrat Ventures, Nevada Business Corporations, Inc., Proback Systems, Inc., Wayne Wakefield. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 5/14/2022.(Booth, Damon) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 3/25/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 4/9/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 4/24/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Placer, Case Number S-CV-0047923, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6840048) by Nevada Business Corporations, Inc., Proback Systems, Inc., Aristocrat Ventures, Wayne Wakefield. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1: Pleadings, Process & Orders, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2: Affidavit of Wayne Wakefield, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Appearance of Counsel) (Booth, Damon) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
