Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Cherrie Bailey, an individual dba Ponderosa Saloon
| Broadcast Music, Inc., Peermusic III Ltd, House of Cash, Inc., Rio Bravo Music, Inc. and Rondor Music International, Inc. dba Irving Music |
| Cherrie Bailey, an individual dba Ponderosa Saloon |
| 3:2022cv00157 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant Cherrie Bailey, an individual dba Ponderosa Saloon, answer due 6/17/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 4/27/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
|
| Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER of U.S. Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ) |
| Filing 7 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Cherrie Bailey, an individual dba Ponderosa Saloon. (Reichenberg, Catherine) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rio Bravo Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., House of Cash, Inc., Peermusic III Ltd, Rondor Music International, Inc. dba Irving Music re #1 Complaint,,. Cherrie Bailey, an individual dba Ponderosa Saloon served on 4/12/2022. (Alarie, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 AO 121 - REPORT on the filing or determination of an action or appeal regarding a copyright. Mailed to the Register of Copyrights, Copyright Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (DRM) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cherrie Bailey, dba Ponderosa Saloon. (DRM) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Chief Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Broadcast Music, Inc., House of Cash, Inc., Peermusic III Ltd, Rio Bravo Music, Inc., Rondor Music International, Inc. dba Irving Music that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliate Gray Television Inc., Other Affiliate TEGNA, Inc. for Broadcast Music, Inc.; Other Affiliate Tencent Holdings Ltd., Other Affiliate Pershing Square Holdings, Other Affiliate Vivendi SA for Rondor Music International, Inc. dba Irving Music; Other Affiliate Brazilian Music Inc. for Peermusic III Ltd added. (Alarie, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cherrie Bailey, an individual dba Ponderosa Saloon (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-6855099) by Rio Bravo Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., House of Cash, Inc., Peermusic III Ltd, Rondor Music International, Inc. dba Irving Music. Proof of service due by 7/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Schedule, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Alarie, Michelle) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
