Mendoza v. Daniels et al
| Justin Mendoza, Ms. Mendoza and Amber Renee Meadows |
| Charles Daniels, Minev, Ray Rivera, William Gitterre and Doctor Exxum |
| 3:2022cv00205 |
| May 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Anne R Traum |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MOTION Support Motion in Support of Appointment of Counsel, by Plaintiff Justin Mendoza. (DRM)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Get Medical Records by Plaintiff Justin Mendoza. Responses due by 5/30/2022. (CJD)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Enforcement Order TRO and Preliminary Injunction to Stop Retaliation re ECF Nos. #3 Motion for TRO, #4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, by Plaintiff Justin Mendoza. Responses due by 5/30/2022. (CJD)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Justin Mendoza. Responses due by 5/20/2022. (Image is duplicate of ECF No. #3 .) (CJD)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Justin Mendoza. (CJD)
|
|
Filing 2
ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Justin Mendoza. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Motion for Counsel) (DRM)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
