Glover v. Reubart et al
Shawn Glover, Jr |
Warden Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
3:2022cv00207 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Craig S Denney |
Larry R Hicks |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 6/29/2022. Letter re status returned. (Attachments: #1 Status request letter)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 6 LETTER requesting status re IFP, filing fee, from Petitioner Shawn Glover, Jr. (DRM) |
Filing 5 ORDER - The initial screening of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. #1 -1) and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #1 -2) are deferred to until such time as he has fully complied with this order. The Clerk of Court is instructed to send Petitioner a blank form IFP application for incarcerated litigants (attached hereto for distribution to Petitioner by ESP law library). Within 30 days of the date of this order, Petitioner must file an IFP application that includes a: (a) financial certificate signed by Petitioner and an authorized prison official, (b) financial declaration and acknowledgement signed by Petitioner, and (c) copy of Petitioner's inmate account statement for the six-month period prior to filing. Alternatively, Petitioner must pay the $5 filing fee within 30 days (IFP or filing fee due by 7/13/2022). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP application) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) Modified on 6/13/2022 to correct typo (HKL). |
Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Shawn Glover, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Motion for appointment of counsel) (HKL) |
Filing 3 ORDER - Screening of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. #1 -1) under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #1 -2) are deferred to until such time as he has fully complied with this order. Clerk of Court is instructed to send Petitioner a blank form IFP application for incarcerated litigants along with two copies of this order (attached hereto for distribution to Petitioner by ESP law library). Within 45 days of the date of this order, Petitioner must file an IFP application that includes a: (a) financial certificate signed by Petitioner and an authorized prison official, (b) financial declaration and acknowledgement signed by Petitioner, and (c) copy of Petitioner's inmate account statement for the six-month period prior to filing. Alternatively, Petitioner must pay the $5 filing fee within 45 days (IFP or filing fee due by 7/2/2022). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application and Instructions, #2 Second copy of Order for Plaintiff) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Warden Reubart, et al, has been received and assigned case number 3:22-cv-00207. (CJD) |
Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel) (CJD) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.