Martenies v. Kijakazi
William Martenies |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel |
3:2022cv00222 |
May 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Craig S Denney |
Miranda M Du |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed for William Martenies re ECF Nos. #7 Summons Issued as to USA, #6 Complaint. Attorney General of the United States on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi served on 6/14/2022. (CJD) Modified on 6/23/2022 (CJD). |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Martenies re ECF No. #7 Summons Issued as to USA re ECF No. #6 Complaint. SSA on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi served on 6/13/2022 pursuant to USPS Tracking. (Attachments: #1 USPS Tracking) (CJD) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Allison Cheung on behalf of Respondent Kilolo Kijakazi. (Cheung, Allison) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney served for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi on 6/9/2022. (DRM) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General re #6 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 U.S. Attorney General, #2 U.S. Attorney's Office - NV) (CJD) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi by William Martenies. Proof of service due by 9/6/2022. (CJD) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting ECF No. #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint shall PROCEED. The Clerk shall FILE the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). The Clerk shall ISSUE summonses and SERVE the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration by sending a copy of the summons and complaint by certified mail to: (1) Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration; and (2) the Attorney General of the United States, Department of Justice. The Clerk shall also ISSUE a summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons and a copy of the complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service to the U.S. Attorneys Office. (Specified details and service addresses herein.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 6/8/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJD) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (WJ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE pursuant to General Order 2019-08: This case has been randomly assigned to a Magistrate Judge pending the parties' consent or declination. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), with written consent of all parties, a Magistrate Judge may conduct all proceedings in a case, including all pretrial and trial proceedings, entry of judgment, and post-trial motions. Any appeals will be made directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A link is being provided to the form on the court's website to indicate whether you consent or decline to proceed before a Magistrate Judge - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (A copy of the notice and consent form have been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) Consent or declination due by 5/26/2022. (DRM) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
Filing 1 MOTION/Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, by Petitioner William Martenies. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (DRM) |
Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.