Ibarra-Roque v. U.S. Department of Immigration et al
Carlos Ibarra-Roque |
U.S. Department of Immigration, I.C.E. and D. Johnson |
3:2022cv00250 |
June 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Anne R Traum |
Deportation |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the in forma pauperis application, (ECF No. #5 ), be DENIED as moot; and that the amended complaint, (ECF No. #4 ), be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Objections to R&R due by 8/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 7/27/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) |
Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Carlos Ibarra-Roque. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Compliance)(DRM) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against I.C.E., U.S. Department of Immigration, D. Johnson by Carlos Ibarra-Roque. Added new party. (CJD) |
![]() |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJD) |
Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (CJD) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.