Williams v. N.D.O.C. et al
| Terrance E. Williams |
| N.D.O.C., Russel, Miller, NNCC and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2022cv00298 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 DISREGARD - Filed in Error in this Case by Clerk - RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Temporary Injunction, #2 Cover Letter) (CJD) Modified on 8/26/2022 (CJD). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Submit an Exhibit #1 by Petitioner Terrance E. Williams. Responses due by 9/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(CJD) (misc) (presiding) |
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 8/25/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
| Filing 8 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Terrance E. Williams. (Filed and dismissed pursuant to ECF No. #7 Order; informal E-service to AG.) (DRM) |
Filing 7
ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice based on Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's Order (ECF No. #4 ) or the Local Rules of Practice. Williams is denied a certificate of appealability. Clerk is instructed to add AG as counsel for Respondents. No response is required from Respondents. Clerk will file the Petition (ECF No. #1 -1) and informally serve the AG with the Petition (ECF No. #1 -1), this order (E-service 8/25/2022; Petition upon subsequent filing), and all other filings in this matter by sending a notice of electronic filing to the AG's office. (NEFs #1-6 regenerated to AG on 8/25/2022.) Clerk is further directed to enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice, and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/24/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 6 EXHIBITS submitted by Petitioner Terrance E. Williams. (CJD) |
| Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Terrance E. Williams. (AB) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Screening deferred until such time as Petitioner has fully complied with this order. Fully complete IFP application, or $5.00 filing fee, due within 45 days of the date of this order (8/19/2022). Failure to timely comply with this order will result in the dismissal of his petition without prejudice and without further advance notice. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/5/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE: Due to the administrative error of assigning District Judge Larry R. Hick, this case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:22-cv-00298-MMD-CSD. (no image attached) (WJ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against N.D.O.C., et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:22-cv-00298. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for WHC) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
