Patten v. Garrett et al
| Kody Cree Patten |
| Garrett and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2022cv00310 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Robert C Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER - Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without having to prepay the full filing fee (ECF No. #1 ) is DENIED. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this order is entered in which to have the $5.00 filing fee sent to the Clerk of Court (by 8/21/2022). Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to RETAIN the petition but not file it at this time. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/22/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Garrett, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:22-cv-00310-RCJ-CLB. (CJD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Kody Cree Patten. (HKL) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Kody Cree Patten. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Cover Letter) (HKL) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
