Goff v. Elko County et al
| Derek Rodney Goff |
| Elko, County of, Aitor Narvaiza and Parry |
| 3:2022cv00342 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - Plaintiff will file an updated address by September 23, 2022. Plaintiff's IFP application for prisoners (ECF No. #1 ) is denied as moot. Clerk is directed to send P approved non-prisoner IFP application w instructions. (Mailed 8/23/2022.) Fully complete IFP application or $402 filing fee due by 9/23/2022. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, this case will be subject to dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 8/23/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re ECF No. #2 Advisory Letter Pro Se non-habeas addressed to Derek Rodney Goff. (HKL) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Assign Judges in Civil Case addressed to Derek Rodney Goff. (CJD) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJD) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (WJ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Derek Rodney Goff. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CJD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
