Knight v. City of Elko et al
| Wade Alan Knight |
| Elko, City of, Ty Trouten, Checketts, Bart Ortiz and Andrew Cunningham |
| 3:2022cv00343 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Anne R Traum |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to ECF No. #6 Report and Recommendation by Plaintiff Wade Alan Knight. (HKL) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the in forma pauperis applications, (ECF Nos. #1 , #4 , #5 ), be DENIED as moot; that the Clerk FILE Knight's complaint, (ECF No. #1 -1); and, that the complaint, (ECF No. #1 -1), be DISMISSED without prejudice, but without leave to amend. Objections to R&R due by 9/29/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/15/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL) |
| Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Wade Alan Knight. (HKL) |
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Wade Alan Knight. (HKL) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBITS, filed by Plaintiff Wade Alan Knight. (DRM) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJD) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Wade Alan Knight. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CJD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
