Williams v. ESP et al
| Terrance E. Williams |
| ESP, T Cooke and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
| 3:2022cv00416 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Anne R Traum |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDERED that Petitioner will have 45 days from the date of this order (12/2/2022) to either pay the $5 filing fee for this action or file a fully completed IFP application. Clerk is directed to send to Petitioner, along with a copy of this order, two in forma pauperis applications. (Two forms attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 10/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions Copy No. 1, #2 IFP form and instructions Copy No. 2)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against ESP, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:22-cv-00416-ART-CLB. (HKL) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Petition) (HKL) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (HKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
