Banks v. Parr Blv Jail et al
| Justin Banks |
| Parr Blv Jail, McKissen, Solitary Ward Dept and Housing Assignment |
| 3:2022cv00458 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT by Justin Banks. (Filed and dismissed with leave to amend pursuant to ECF No. #3 Order; courtesy copy mailed to P.) (DRM) |
Filing 3
SCREENING ORDER - Plaintiff's initial application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is granted. Clerk will file the complaint and will send Plaintiff a courtesy copy. (Copy mailed to P 12/5/2022.) The complaint is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice, and with leave to amend. Any "First Amended" complaint due by 1/4/2023. Clerk will send P 1983 from and instructions. (Form and instr mailed to P 12/5/2022.) Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/5/2022. (copy of complaint sent to P)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Justin Banks. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
