Cuddy v. Starbucks Corporation DBA Starbucks Coffee Company
| Janine C Cuddy |
| Starbucks Corporation DBA Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee |
| 3:2022cv00459 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Anne R Traum |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Starbucks Corporation. (DRM) |
| Filing 2 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Starbucks Corporation by Janine C Cuddy. No changes to parties. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed Summons) (Geddes, William) |
| Case randomly assigned to ENE Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Starbucks Corporation DBA Starbucks Coffee Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7085965) by Janine C Cuddy. Proof of service due by 1/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Plaintiff's Certificate of Interested Parties) (Geddes, William) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
