Romero v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Peggy Romero
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2022cv00466
Filed: October 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER approving ECF No. #11 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel H. Fishman for Peggy Romero and approving Designation of Local Counsel Hal Taylor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/30/2022. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 First MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Daniel H. Fishman and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Hal Taylor (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7128835) by Plaintiff Peggy Romero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing)(Taylor, Hal)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Oscar Gonzalez on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Gonzalez, Oscar)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Case to Magistrate Judge. (Document restricted under General Order 2021-03.)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USM on behalf of Peggy Romero re ECF Nos. #6 Summons Issued, #5 Complaint. Commissioner Of Social Security served on 10/27/2022. (CJS)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER CONCERNING REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/25/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner Of Social Security c/o Office of the Regional Chief Counsel; c/o Attorney General of the United States; and c/o U.S. Attorney for District of Nevada. (Issued and service pursuant to ECF No. #4 Order.) (Attachments: #1 U.S. Attorney General, #2 U.S. Attorney) (DRM)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security by Peggy Romero. (Filed and served pursuant to ECF No. #4 Order.) (DRM)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - Plaintiff's IFP application (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. The complaint shall PROCEED. The Clerk is instructed to FILE the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). The Clerk shall ISSUE summonses and SERVE the Commissioner by mailing summons and complaint via certified mail to Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, and, Attorney General of United States as specified herein. (Cert Mail Nos. 7013 1710 0001 6894 0811, and 7013 1710 0001 6894 2259 respectively on 10/25/2022.) Clerk shall also ISSUE summons to the U.S. Attorney for District of Nevada deliver the summons and the complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service on U.S. Attorney's Office, Reno. (Email to USM on 10/25/2022.) Henceforth, P shall serve D or D's attorney a copy of every pleading submitted for consideration, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/25/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE pursuant to General Order 2019-08: This case has been randomly assigned to a Magistrate Judge pending the parties' consent or declination. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), with written consent of all parties, a Magistrate Judge may conduct all proceedings in a case, including all pretrial and trial proceedings, entry of judgment, and post-trial motions. Any appeals will be made directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A link is being provided to the form on the court's website to indicate whether you consent or decline to proceed before a Magistrate Judge - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (A copy of the notice and consent form have been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) Consent or declination due by 11/4/2022. (HKL)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (HKL)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Peggy Romero. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Taylor, Hal)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal by Plaintiff Peggy Romero. (E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, #3 Summons Summonses.3)(Taylor, Hal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romero v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peggy Romero
Represented By: Hal Taylor
Represented By: Daniel H. Fishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Represented By: Oscar Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?